Managing stress in the workplace is no different to managing any other
workplace hazard. It is the responsibility of both the employee and
the employer to ensure they have taken “all practicable steps.”
Both parties should work together to find solutions to managing and
eliminating work place stress.?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" >
In investigating whether to take legal action against a company, OSH will
look for evidence of:
· Harm –
confirmation by a medical practitioner that some harm is or has been
suffered.
· Recognisable
Stressors – as an employer you knew, ought to have known or had been told
about employee’s issues.
· Serious hazards
- without which the harm would not have occurred
· Coercion – the
employee has no choice but to work in these conditions
· Lack of action
– as an employer you failed to rectify or investigate the potential hazards
once were aware of them.
Stress – “An interaction between the person and their (work)
environment and is an awareness of not being able to cope with the demands
of one’s environment, when this realisation is of concern to the person, in
that both are associated with a negative emotional response.”
Stressor – “Events or circumstances which in general result in
pressure. A perception that the physical or psychological demands are
about to be exceeded.” Stressors can arise both in and out of work and the
employer must be able to identify and manage both.
Fatigue – “The temporary inability, or decrease in ability or strong
disinclination to respond to a situation, because of inadequate recuperation
from previous over-activity, mental, emotional or physical.”
OSH broadly defines issues that cause stress as inevitable or avoidable.
Inevitable: That is the potential stress caused by starting a
new job, being promoted, dealing with emergencies and intrinsic
difficulties. Research indicates that people working in occupations such as
health care, police, ambulance and prison services are amongst the most
likely to suffer workplace stress. The very nature of their roles is
stressful. While an employer cannot be expected to eradicate these,
the Act does require that procedures/programmes are in place to support the
employee.
Avoidable: Stress caused by undertaking hazardous work, working for
too many hours each week or for long periods in a physically demanding
environment. Other factors might be the absence of performance
management, bullying and harassment, lack of resources and unrealistic
timeframes.
The Act recognises that the employer has no control over stress caused by
out of work factors such as relationship issues or family illness. However
the employer is considered responsible for being aware of issues that may
impact on an employees work standards and the effect that these outside
influences may have on the safety of the employee and those employees who
they may work with.
Managing Workplace Stress
Existing hazard identification programmes can be utilised to identify,
investigate and evaluate areas of concern and if necessary management
programmes introduced. This is no different to managing any other
potential hazard in the workplace. An employer should take particular
note of unreasonable demands and unavoidable stressors within the workplace
and any unhealthy work practices.
1. Elimination
2. Isolation
3. Minimisation
The identification and removal of stressors in the workplace by developing:
· Safe work
practices
· Balanced work
schedules
· Sociable
responsibility
· Systems in
place for identifying hazards
· Pleasant work
environments
· Safe work
environments
Right people in right jobs
· training
· performance
management
· workload
· recruitment and
selection procedures
Stress management processes that provide support to
employees who are feeling the effects of stress.
· managing the
length of exposure to the stressor
· training in
dealing with stress
· work based
training
· organisational
training
· support for any
personal issues
· exercise
programmes or relief breaks
· management of
any critical incidences
· encouraging
employee involvement
· outside
professionals at employees' disposal for assistance such as employee
assistance programmes
Communication is the key to acting in GOOD FAITH
1. The
employer and employee need work together to find a solution.
2. You
must deal with issues early to prevent further harm and take steps to
eradicate or reduce the impact.
3. Make
sure all the facts are carefully considered.
4. Identify
cause both obvious and underlying.
5. Provide
a support person to lessen the effect of the stress being felt such as a
Health & Safety Representative.
6. Provide
assistance if this is required
Processes
1. Investigate
any complaint or report of stress
2. Is
this a work-related issue?
3. Discuss
the results of your investigation
4. Suggest
solutions
5. Ask
for additional solutions
6. Agree
on the implementation of the solutions
Critical Incidences
There is no doubt about the need to provide support to employees following a
critical incidence such as death. However there is considerable
dispute over the methods of support and the value of critical incidence
stress debriefing. Rather OSH recommends that:
· Staff should
not be forced to attend debriefing sessions.
· Employers
should focus on support which enables the employee to take their own steps
towards coping.
· Provide
training in personal skills that can help an employee get through an
incident such as death.
· Allow the
employee to access a supervisor or manager.
· Provide easy
access to professional help.
Creating a Programme
If you have an existing health & safety co-ordinator or team then
the design, implementation and management of a programme can be an extension
of their existing duties and responsibilities.
The co-ordinator should have both time and resources to dedicate to the role.
They should be capable of negotiating with other managers in the
implementation and on going management of a Stress Prevention Programme. The
co-ordinator should work with a team of people who is representative of the
company structure and encourage pro-active input into the design of any
programme. Both the co-ordinator and the team should be provided with
training in terms of legislation, stress recognition and programmes.
In determining the needs of a programme, and audit should be carried out
that aims to find out what employees find rewarding at work and identify
existing or potential hazards.
An audit should aim to discover:
· What people
like about their work
· How that could
still be improved
· How stressful
they find the environment?
· What causes
them stress within the workplace?
· Is the work
itself stressful or the way it is performed?
· What do the
employees see as the most critical areas for consideration?
In carrying out an audit the Health & Safety Co-ordinator might also want to
consider factors such as:
· Level of
absenteeism
· ACC claims
· Staff turnover
rates
· Reasons why
staff leave
· Productivity
Sick leave, low staff retention rates and high incidences of ACC claims are
all indicators that there may be workplace stress in the company. Use
of best practice HR procedures such as exit interviews, performance
management and climate surveys can be of assistance in investigation of some
of these issues. These will also help to measure the success of any
programme over a longer period.
IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
This document and all other documents on this website are provided as resources
only. They do not purport to constitute or substitute for legal advice. Hughesdirect.com
(Pat O’Shea & Associates Limited) do not accept responsibility for
the consequences of use of this document nor for any errors/omissions or misdescriptions
of any kind. This disclaimer shall be a term of use of this and other documents
on this website.